Hillary: It makes all the difference in the World

Bill O’Reilly “What you wanna know about Hillary” section

2016-09-09

Note to readers: Links are included in the text for your reference (should you believe I’m full of it.) They are not intended to bog you down with mounds of words.

 

Watching Bill O’Reilly “Talking Points Memo” tonight, we was being very matter of fact when answering viewer questions for “What you want to know about Hillary.”  I was initially somewhat turned off by what appeared to be a bending over backwards to not appear critical or analytical.  I now believe it was just that: “What do you want to know (just the facts.)  I still think his viewers would have been better served if it were “What do you want to know (what it is)

So to satisfy my own desire for “What it is” I decided to grab some context and put it in a document under each of O’Reilly’s summarized question.

 


[Question #1] “What is Hilary’s stand on Black lives matter?” 

[Summarized Response from B.O’r] Mostly supportive in an instructional fashion:No Democrat would dare to oppose the group “Black Lives Matter.”  

CONTEXT:

Interesting fact about this Organization, it is supported by Rich “WHITE” Liberals who promote Socialism:
“BLM might have been founded by blacks, but the movement requires money to operate — for protest signs, bull horns, and transportation of protesters to protest sites. The national scope of BLM requires an infrastructure, which includes regular communication among BLM activists. Who pays for their phone calls, faxes, iPhones, and Internet? How can BLM activists do all that if they also work at a regular job? And if they don’t have a regular job, who is paying for their food and lodging and transportation?

In other words, who actually fund Black Lives Matter and therefore are responsible for the violence, deaths, and injuries of BLM protests?

The answer: two groups —

  1. Democracy Alliance, comprised of very wealthy Democrats.
  2. Freedom Road Socialist Organization, funded by big corporations and foundations.”

 


[Question #2] Speculation about Hillary’s health, when did she last release her medial records?

[Summarized Response from B.O’r] Her Doctor Lisa Barnack released a summary of her health in July 2015: Seasonal Allergies and hyp-thyroidism but is generally in good health.

(NOTE: The previous night he smugly impugned “conservative” media for making a big deal about hillary’s coughing spasm.)

CONTEXT:

This is an interesting taking point because it involves so much speculation and outside observation based on her performance/appearance from public events. 

Despite the pressure to demonstrate via official health records she’s in tip-top shape, there is mostly silence.
A Google search of “Hillary’s Health,” news articles over last 24 hours from the time of this writing read:

 

Given the dishonesty from Hillary herself and the dishonesty of the news media (how they slavishly cover for Hillary) I wouldn’t doubt there is a real health issue with Hillary, but really, do Democrats or casual-attention voters actually care?  Probably not.  Should they?  Well, yes.  That could very well mean Tim Kaine becomes president.
Finally, Some site called infowars.com has a YouTube channel twith a Center-right summary of the health issue:  https://youtu.be/HR8TlRFnICE 

[Question #3] How did Hillary get concussion before her testimony at the Benghazi hearing:

[Summarized Response from B.O’r]  Dec 2021 Hillary fainted while sick with a stomach virus sustaining a concussion.  She had a blood clot in the skull addressed by blood thinners subscribe by her doctor.  Later she told the FBI she couldn’t recall some of the testimony.

CONTEXT:

I think this rolls up into Health Question above.  Hillary Clinton is a pathological liar.  It very well falls into the Health Speculation above.


[Question #4] Why didn’t Hillary respond to [Benghazi] Ambassador Stevens request to move the Embassy?

[Summarized Response from B.O’r]   We can find no evidence of a request ever made but he did ask for more security (Bill says was denied by undersecretary of State Patrick Kennedy):
{Video Clip from House Benghazi hearings}
– 1st Qtr 2012 just over 100+ increased security requests  (Hillary denies receiving them)
– 2nd Qtr. 2012 172-ish 
– July/Aug and Weekend before attacks – 83
   (By house count there were over 600 requests)
Congressman” : Did none of those reach your desk? Is that correct?
Hillary: That is correct.
{Video Clip End}

Bill O’Reilly replies (as if being just CSPAN giving play by play announcement): “Bottom line, Former Secretary of State maintains she was unaware of ANY security request from Libya”

CONTEXT:

This is the topic that prompted me to start this blog entry.  Bill flatlined his response reading “Just facts”, but he omitted contextual facts.

  1. Hillary is a pathological liar.
  2. Her office received over 600 security requests. ** Not a single one was elevated to her attention???  **I live in the real world.  Not believable at all.
  3. Benghazi:
    1. … has been revealed as a gun running operation to “Syrian Rebels” of whom some have since formed themselves as ISIS
      1. Link: http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/11/30/benghazi-commission-obama-admin-gun-running-scheme-armed-islamic-state/
    2.  ISIS is a brutal organization, Al Qaedas dream
      1. Escaped Isis militant reveals reality of the jihadist group’s brutality: ‘They abused and mutilated dead bodies’ : ‘They were extremely brutal, killing women and the elderly who did not obey them,’ the former jihadist said
        1. Link: http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/middle-east/escaped-isis-militant-reveals-reality-of-the-jihadist-groups-brutality-they-abused-and-mutilated-a7122371.html 
What is the likelihood Hillary wanted to cover up her destructive actions which helped Strengthen and form ISIS?  Don’t play us for fools. 

[Question #5] What was the flesh colored device in Hillary’s ear? 

[Summarized Response from B.O’r]  Campaign maintains there was no device.  Lighting reflection gave rise to the suspicion.”

CONTEXT:

Uhhh, sure.   I don’t really believe Hillary needs to have someone chirping in her ear about what lies to tell.  And even if she does, it is a (very small) drop in the bucket for the larger pond of her dishonesty and subterfuge.


[Question #6] What’s Hillary’s association with the radical Saul Alinsky.

[Summarized Response from B.O’r]  Hillary did her Wellesley college thesis on Saul and had very nice things to say about him.  He offered her a job, but turned him down to go to Law School at Yale. {Then Bill points out} she was a Barry Goldwater supporter in High School.

CONTEXT:

Saul Alinsky is held up as the proto-type community organizer, and his book “Rules for Radicals” is the manifesto.  

  • Humorously (and sickly) he dedicates his manifesto to “Lucifer, the original radical”.  (Makes me a little heart sick even typing that)

Another influential philosophy of the time was the Cloward-Piven strategy:

The Cloward–Piven strategy is a political strategy outlined in 1966 by American sociologists and political activists Richard Cloward and Frances Fox Piven that called for overloading the U.S. public welfare system in order to precipitate a crisis that would lead to a replacement of the welfare system with a national system of “a guaranteed annual income and thus an end to poverty”. [1][2]
  • Wikipedia softballs here quite a bit.The Correct Context: Ultimately this kind of Philosophy leads to a Soviet-style Communism/Socialism.  That is the only system that claims to end poverty.  It also stifles human spirit by driving a “sameness” among the country class who is ruled by an “Elite” Establishment.
I can draw this out in another post, but we see the 60’s radicals who have made it into our government implementing the Alinsky/Cloward-Pivens philosphies today, accelerated during the Obama Administration:
  • Heap lots of debt onto our country and our system. (Obama increased our debt from 4 Trillion to 19+ Trillion in 8 years, diverting attention from himself while blaming Bush.  A lapdog media in agreement is very useful in spreading this propaganda.)
  • Cause chaos and confusion (community organization) to rile up the people to protest for change.
It’s a perfect storm, of which both Obama and Hillary are students – desiring to bring the U.S. into a more socialist style control : country class ruled by the Elitist Establishment (themselves.)
An article from National Review addresses this if you have the fortitude to wade through the depth of context : http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/388560/why-hillarys-alinsky-letters-matter-stanley-kurtz 

[Question #7] What are the facts in Hillary leaving the Watergate investigation?

[Summarized Response from B.O’r]  She left because Nixon resigned.  As an attorney working for the house judiciary committee when Nixon left her job was over.

CONTEXT:

Nothing for me to add here.  Pretty bland question surrounded by controversy.  If she got fired 40 years ago, so what?   I have heard things (not repeated here) about her driving dislike of Nixon, but I don’t have any immediate sources and it only gets a dismissive mention here.

Yet, it is fascinating how many in the Establishment Media are comparing Hillary’s email server (and the missing Bleach-bit emails) to Richard Nixon’s 18 1/2 minutes of gap in recordings [source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nixon_White_House_tapes ].

[Question #8] Can you sue any federal official if you don’t like their conduct in office?

[Summarized Response from B.O’r]  1985 Supreme Court makes it almost impossible to win a case against any official

CONTEXT:

Interesting how the Establishment covers for itself.  The Founding Fathers would Flip their wigs (literally) if they knew this was going on.

Some boring “Just the facts” documents about this:  http://www.federalpracticemanual.org/node/48  Quoted below:
The Supreme Court held in Stump v. Sparkman that judges have absolute immunity from Section 1983 damage actions for their “judicial” acts.
I especially “liked” this section:
Absolute immunity bars any action against officials in the conduct of their office even for actions taken maliciously or in bad faith. Absolute immunity focuses on the governmental function being performed and the nature of the responsibilities of the official, not on the specific action taken.
All I can say is: #Establishment 

 [Question #9] Where is Brian Pagliano?

[Summarized Response from B.O’r]  Long time aide to Clinton and handled private server out of Chapuqua home – but what he told the bureau remains a mystery.  And where he is right now is also a mystery.

CONTEXT:

Now we know about a person named Brian Pagliano. This personality in the whole Hillary email coverup escaped me over the last few months.

My Final Thoughts

So I have to ask myself, why do I blog such things?  Simply, I am interested in these matters.  If such personalities get control of our government I believe (I know) they will dictate the direction our nation and culture take for years to come.
Having said that, perish the thought another “Clinton” rise to power in this country.  They will do great damage to both nation and culture, as they already have.  (Lewinsky anyone? – “Its just sex”)
No, it wasn’t just sex.  It was:
  • Adultery
  • Sexual Harassment
  • Inappropriate Relations between a boss and subordinate
Then Hillary comes along with Benghazi and these emails:
  • Lies about the nature of the Evidence and the Truth discovered
  • Spreads lies about why the attack happened (a video for which the producer was put into jail)
  • Leaves snake-wiggle cushion for herself when she says:
    • “I believe” everything is turned over
    • “To the best I recall” …
  • Diverts attention from herself (and her warts) by wantonly charging her opponent with Racism/Bigotry/Misogynistic hater (all emotional, unprovable, subjective.)

 

During a Senate Investigation hearing into Benghazi, when asked if it was a video/protest at Benghazi she shot back: “What difference does it make at this point?”

Hillary is a pathological liar.
It makes ALL the difference in the world.

One thought on “Hillary: It makes all the difference in the World

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s